|
Plenary
Session
III: Report of Topical Working Groups
November
11, 2002
Chair: Carl Gershman
Panelists:
George Mathew, G. Rajasekaran, David McQuoid-Mason, Can Paker,
Genaro Arriagada, Miklos Marshall, Hyun-Sook Lee, Veton Surroi,
Pavol Demes.
Panel
1, Genaro Arriagada – Strengthening Political Party Systems
Our panel
was integrated of a group of distinguished people, most of
whom are members of parliament. The discussion was interesting
and all panelists agreed that political parties are one of
the cornerstones in democratic society. Without democracy
there would be no political parties. In many areas of the
world, political parties face adversity and strife. The overall
consensus was that political parties deserve overall criticism
and should be highly scrutinized because they are responsible
for representing the constituency in the best possible way.
The discussion was centered on changing how political parties
work and the expectations of parties. It was agreed that constituents
should be more involved and active with their political parties
and that parties should practice internal and external democracy
in order to be efficient and productive in society. As a community
of democracies, it is necessary for political parties and
leaders to be more engaged in political and democratic events
and forums. The first recommendation is to create a stronger
relationship among all parties, domestic and international.
The second is, the community of democracies must be a forum
for discussion among all parties. There are two mistakes,
one is the situation in which we have a strong civil society
and no parties and the other is strong political parties without
a civil society. Another recommendation is that multilateral
organizations adopt measures to focus concern towards political
and democratic growth and support political party systems
and models. There are political crises all over the world
and as a community we should work together to mend the crises
and strengthen the system as a whole. One of the biggest challenges
for parties is corruption and funding. Finances and funding
are unsteady issues that lead to negative views. Many countries
have created efficient programs for the development of political
parties and it is an overall common goal to do the same with
all political governments.
Panel
2, Can Paker – Market and Democratic Governance
- To
strengthen the foundation for the functioning of markets
and to improve democratic governance, we propose that the
Community of Democracies commit themselves to establish
a private property regime, also as a key component to support
entrepreneurship. We strongly urge the Community of Democracies
to include property rights within the Warsaw Declaration.
- To
build a middle class supportive of democratic development,
governments must reduce the costs of entry into the economy
for entrepreneurs, the informal sector, and especially the
poor, by simplifying business registration, licensing, and
tax procedures.
- To
increase business association and labor union participation
in democracy promotion programs.
- To
increase the democratic component of economic reforms, governments,
including donors, should provide for more intense public
participation by increasing disclosure of draft regulations
and legislation.
- To
increase disclosure and transparency in society, governments
must adopt freedom of information laws that will increase
the flow of financial and economic information. Also, donors
should provide training and support for financial and economic
journalists.
- To
strengthen markets and democratic governance, it is essential
to have independent regulatory and economic institutions.
To develop the necessary public support and local capacity
for such institutions, especially in developing and transition
economies, donor countries should support local policy institutions
or think tanks.
Panel
3, Miklos Marshall – Corruption and Democracy
There
are five recommendations that the panel made. Corruption is
a universal problem that affects all nations, rich and poor,
developed and undeveloped. Where corruption is pervasive,
the fight against corruption must be diligent and strong.
Those who are guilty of corruption should be held responsible
for their mistakes and be punished. It should be required
that leaders sign legal statements and those who falsely sign
or deceive should be properly punished. The recommendations
are as follows.
- We
recommend that the states of the community of democracies
provide adequate funding to enable groups to monitor the
funding of countries.
- In
the allocation of development assistance, normal countries
provide preferences to countries that are clearly on the
path to democracy in order to fight corruption.
- Member
states should support national and international banking
laws to provide for greater transparency.
- Member
states should provide greater access to information for
the public on issues such as campaign finance, healthcare,
etc.
- Member
states that provide international development assistance
should provide funding for education, etc.
Panel
4, David McQuoid-Mason – Education for Democracy, Civic Education
- There
is a need for greater cooperation in strengthening education
and the expansion of democracy. The one practical and bold
recommendation falls into two parts. In line with the Warsaw
Declaration’s endorsement of democracy education, and its
recognition of the necessity of collaboration between governments
and NGOs in this regard, we recommend that the governments
of the Convening Group should, within six months,
convene a meeting of representatives of their governments,
other governments, along with an equal number of representatives
of national and international NGOs, and multilateral institutions
– such as UNDP, UNESCO, UNICEF, World Bank, and regional
bodies – to develop a strategy for promoting democracy education
worldwide.
- The
Democracy Education NGO Forum of the Democracy/Civic Education
Roundtable has established a Steering Committee to assist
the Convening Group in carrying out this proposal.
Panel
5, G. Rajasekaran – Democracy, Freedom of Association, and
the Protection of NGO’s
The situation
around the world is growing worse in protecting NGO’s. The
competition for foreign investment is driving labor down.
In Zimbabwe, the labor unions are under direct attack by the
government. The process of globalization has improved and
resulted in a new form of networking around the world. What
we can do is maintain the importance of our community and
increase the cooperation of organizations all over the world
in protecting rights. The use of new technologies such as
the internet is influential in maintaining a network. Democracies
should provide a set of rights to all people and an environment
that follows accordingly with the set of rights.
Panel 6, George Mathew – Local Government and Democracy
The local
government is the foundation of a nation’s democratic structure
and practices. It is a training ground for politicians and
facilitates multiparty governance and political pluralism.
Local governments and democracy encourage and facilitate poverty
alleviation, greater participation in the electoral process,
women’s participation in society, and the participation of
excluded communities. Local governments have been influential
in opening up and democratizing the military and authoritarian
regimes. (Cases of Germany, Nigeria, and Brazil) Therefore,
considerable attention and importance should be paid towards
local governments and democracies.
Panel
7, Pavol Demes – Promoting Civil Society in Closed Societies
Lively
discussion started out with addressing cases such as Burma,
North Korea, and Cuba. Several recommendations resemble other
panel recommendations. The international and global community
should create pressure to protect human rights. Efforts should
be made to release falsely accused and imprisoned prisoners.
They should encourage the freedom of expression in media in
whatever way possible and recognize genuine civil activists
and groups in order to engage with them in a professional
and productive manner on a regular basis for the overall betterment
of the community of democracies around the world.
Panel
8, Veton Surroi - Media and Democracy
Press
freedom is a universal value and should be agreed to by all
governments. There should be no attempts to define press freedom
on any ethnic, regional, or religious basis. The free flow
of information should be guaranteed. The debate over the “new
information order” is irrelevant and regressive. We call upon
participants in the Community of Democracies to convene at
the upcoming UNESCO meeting to develop a common position to
safeguard freedom of the media. Access to state held information
must be guaranteed. There should be transparency and public
dissemination of information related to the working of state
institutions. All governments should put in place legislation
providing for freedom of information access. The distribution
of broadcast frequencies should be a transparent process governed
by autonomous entities that reflect the diversity of society.
Any restriction on the freedom of media justified by national
security should be narrowly drawn and interpreted. The withholding
of information under the aegis of a broad and imprecise definition
of national security is unacceptable. We welcome the attention
drawn to the issues of ownership and the influence of the
corporate world in the media sector. This issue needs to be
addressed without compromising basic journalistic freedoms.
The Non-Governmental Forum volunteers to outline problems
and issue of this area for the upcoming meeting in Santiago.
We welcome the raising of issues posed by the expansion of
the internet. The Non-Governmental Forum recommends that internet
content not be restricted, that internet distribution be diverse
and accessible and not be controlled by a monopoly.
Panel
9, Hyun-Sook Lee - Gender and Democracy
Gender
refers to the social constructs of sex ie: masculinity and
femininity. Incorporating a gender perspective into an expanding
and strengthening democracy helps us to understand how these
social constructs of gender may assist or hamper efforts to
promote democracy.
While
gender issues are not necessarily women’s issues, it is the
obstacles to women’s full participation in democratic societies
that present some of the greatest challenges to the achievement
if full democracy. When over half the population is hampered
in their participation with government or ignored in government
policy or even restricted by the government, full democracy
is not in effect.
Recommendations
are as follows:
- The
existence of a coherent national plan for achieving gender
equality, which includes specific targets such as, increasing
the political representation and participation of women
in elections and at different levels of government, eliminating
discrimination against women in government programs, increasing
women’s access to employment, reducing violence against
women, the inclusion of gender issues in civic education
at all levels, particularly the inclusion of gender issues
and awareness in any educational reform efforts, and the
inclusion of gender issues in government budgeting processes.
- Member
and candidate governments should measure and report on gender
opportunity and equality, and present sex disaggregated
data to the Community of Democracies. Member governments
should report on the implementation of national action plans.
In addition,
we recommend that member governments of the Community of Democracies
commit to supporting and raising gender issues in international
organizations and should the Community of Democracies establish
a Secretariat, the Secretariat should have equal gender representation
at all levels. And last but not least, more women should be
present on official government delegations to the Community
of Democracy meetings.
Chairman
Gershman
An overall
issue that seems to face all the panels and groups is the
issue of human rights. Oppressive governments should not be
tolerated. Another common issue is cooperation. Cooperation
across all sectors and issues is crucial in attaining democracy
and promoting democratic ideals.
|