|
George
Soros Press Conference
November
10, 2002
3rd Floor, J.W. Marriott Hotel
Opening
comments by DCP President Morton H. Halperin: This press conference
is in regards to the release of a text of appeal to governments
from this conference, which was just presented at the plenary
meeting here at the CDNGF Conference by Mr. George Soros.
All participants will sign the document. It has been conveyed
to the Ministerial Communities of Democracies Conference that
is just recently beginning. Basically, the appeal makes two
related sets of proposals, with an additional third. It suggests
that only countries that respect the 2000 Warsaw Declaration,
be part of the Communities of Democracies, and that this be
strict with future participants. We are asking the convening
group to accept stricter standards for participation. Second,
to put teeth into the before-mentioned proposal, and also
make it more valuable for countries to participate in the
Communities of Democracies. Third, countries should have caucases
on democracy, and use their respective institutions to vote
on democratic issues. Additionally, there are ten observer
countries here at the conference, who are not wholly accepted
as members of the Communities of Democracies. This should
continue.
George Sorros: Sorry I’m late. I won’t make any statements,
but answer your questions;
Q: Background: How much teeth will this (CD) organization
have?
A: If
it is adopted, it would make a difference whether you were
a member or not a member. If you are a member or candidate,
you would have benefits of being a member. Over time, it becomes
more important (to become a member). Being a member is a matter
of reputation, and it becomes a much more crucial issue, with
incentives to meet criteria. Members would subscribe to proposals
made, where others wouldn’t.
Q: Regarding the Communities of Democracy non-governmental
and governmental conferences difference: What do you expect
to happen?
A: Not
much. But I hope that if we can mount an effective campaign,
that the 2004 Santiago Conference will be more positive. This
appeal comes far too late to interest the CD ministerial conference,
as they have already agreed (on their proposals) . It still
should be considered by (democratic) governments, and adopted
at the next conference. Hopefully, participants in both conferences
will also have caucases regarding Communities of Democracies
in the meantime. That is further down the road, however. It
could really affect the membership of the commissions. The
idea is also that you could also develop more regional interest,
specifically in the African region, with economic partnership
and increased development. And I think civil society could
make (the above-mentioned) regional conferences more effective.
Q: When you asked what was expected, and you said “not
much”, and you are going to wait for two years, is that interpreted
as pessimism of Communities of Democracies?
A: Conferences
can be very valuable, but there needs to be something, some
substance, and operational results in order to be sustained.
Otherwise there would be apathy … Although discussions continue,
nothing happens. This appeal could put substance behind the
Warsaw Declaration, which made a very importance step forward.
It would also put greater interest for democratic countries
to extend more to non-democratic countries . We need to offer
incentives…it should only be as a last resort to interfere.
There needs to be some positive action, and only cumulative
action as a last resort. This is a framework for positive
action.
Q: Why no deadline for declaration or appeals?
Morton
H. Halperin: This is democracy, not an endpoint. No country
reaches every point of a criteria. There is no perfection,
just countries with potential. Therefore, we need to develop
better criteria for specific countries. I’m asking for this
to happen more explicitly, to decide potential for each country
to make.
Q: Why are you so involved and concerned?
A: Because
of my foundation (The George Soros Fund Foundation). I believe
it is a more comprehensive idea of democracy. It is really
quite central to the mission of a civil society network.
|