|
Concept
Paper CD NGO Forum Bucharest
November 14-15, 2003, Bucharest, Romania
The
following website bucharest-cd-ngoforum.ro
provides full information for the November 14-15 Bucharest
Regional Conference of Community of Democracies nongovernmental
forum (for countries belonging to the Regional East European
Group at the United Nations, plus Estonia)
In order
to focus discussions, it is important to build common understanding
on the main concepts involved in the topics proposed for the
NGO Forum.
EDUCATION
FOR DEMOCRACY
REGIONAL MECHANISMS FOR COOPERATION
GOOD GOVERNANCE AND CORRUPTION
EDUCATION FOR DEMOCRACY
For the success of democratic reforms,
education and learning may be more important than infrastructure
and capital investments.
In Seoul, the Community of Democracies Ministerial
Conference as well as the NGO Forum recognized the importance
of promoting a culture of democracy through education for
democracy.
As a follow-up step, in New York, June 8-10,
2003 the Council for a Community of Democracies and the American
Forum for Global Education organized an international conference,
where a Global Strategic Plan for Democracy Education was
developed.
Education for Democracy has "the aim
to transform political culture and behavior of citizens and
governments in ways supportive of democratic values and governance"
.
Education for Democracy should use "interactive
and practically oriented teaching methods and trainee-centered
learning" ,so that the education processes result in:
Informed Citizens
With improved understanding and knowledge of democratic institutions,
rule of law and human rights in order to:
(a) take informed decisions
(b) benefit from their rights
(c) respect their duties
Engaged Citizens With A Sense Of Shared
Responsibility
With improved knowledge and skills in participatory problem
solving/planning and
in managing differences and conflicts, in order to:
(a) participate effectively and responsibly to address the
problems of their
society
(b) respect diversity
(c) prevent violence
Democratic Leaders
With improved knowledge and skills in principled and democratic
leadership in order to
(a) base leadership on ethical values
(b) be capable to promote change in an effective and efficient
way
(c) be open to share power when guiding cooperative actions.
REGIONAL MECHANISMS
FOR COOPERATION
Regional cooperation can play a key role in promoting democratic
governance. Countries with largely similar experiences in
CEE have much to benefit from exchanging best practices and
lessons learned from their recent past.
Networking has proven to be an efficient mechanism
used by civil society to build people-to-people and organization-to-organization
professional and human relations.
Networking breaks the isolation imposed on
CEE countries for decades and opens their societies, creating
opportunities to exchange ideas and expertise, to develop
common understanding on basic concepts and to create a platform
for mutual support and stability.
The following are key elements for a strong
and sustainable Regional Network:
- Clear,
common goals
- Strong
and committed members
-
A structure that provides services to address members' needs
and keep them together.
Many NGOs from CEE have extensive experience
in promoting democracy through education and capacity building
programs. Many of them also have experience in cooperating
at regional level with like-minded organizations from other
countries, promoting democratic processes, building sustainable
networks that overcome borders and differences.
The Bucharest NGO Forum will offer opportunities
for NGOs to share experiences and look for ways to further
enhance regional cooperation in support of democracy and open
societies.
GOOD GOVERNANCE AND
CORRUPTION
The negative impact of corruption on development is no longer
questioned. Genuine evidence from across the globe proves
that corruption hinders economic development; directs investment
and public expenditure away from needed social services and
infrastructure that benefit the poor. It also fosters an anti-democratic
environment characterized by uncertainty, unpredictability
and declining moral values and disrespect for constitutional
institutions and authority. Corruption therefore reflects
a democracy, human rights and governance deficit that negatively
impacts on poverty and human security. Often these consequences
spill across borders and threaten international peace and
stability.
Governance is not limited to government activities,
it is a larger concept describing the way in which a country
is governed, decisions concerning public affairs are made
and implemented, with the contribution of and collaboration
among, the public sector (government), private sector (business),
and third sector (civil society)
Good
Governance is the extent to which citizens perceive a government
to be
-
Legitimate
- Committed
to improve general public welfare
-
Equitable, favoring no special interests or groups
-
Competent to maintain law and order and to deliver public
services
-
Able to create an enabling environment for productive activities,
exercise of basic human rights, and participation.
Corruption is defined as "the misuse
of public power, office or authority for private benefit -
through bribery, extortion, influence peddling, nepotism,
fraud, speed money or embezzlement" . It has a negative
impact on numerous aspects of social and economic life, e.g.
it reduces economic growth, decreases and diverts government
revenues, misallocates scarce resources, renders government
regulations ineffective, breeds impunity and dilutes public
integrity, and violates human rights.
Corruption is one of the biggest dangers for
the consolidation of democracy in our region, especially because
during the economic and political transition from authoritarian
rule to democracy corruption is likely to increase and spread.
Many people blame corruption for the fact that neither freer
markets nor democratic reforms have yet lived up to their
expectations.
There are different varieties of corruption,
which harm democracy to various extents. Corruption that undercuts
the rules of the democratic game, for example corruption in
political parties, justice system, banking and credit systems,
can damage democratization through hindering economic and
political development. Corruption that lets polluters damage
rivers and constructions fall apart at the first earthquake
killing people, can be devastating.
Most dangerous is that corruption eats away
popular trust in democratic institutions, the legitimacy and
credibility of governments. And when democratic institutions
lose credibility, a climate of instability, unrest and general
lawlessness may emerge, which is just few steps away from
returning to an extremist, authoritarian regime, through nominally
free elections.
However, in the long run, a stable and well
functioning democracy can generate more powerful antidotes
against corruption and its negative consequences than regimes
in which political liberties are suppressed.
An important way to strengthen democracy is
to promote good governance, to fix the systems that breed
corruption. Most people tend to think that corruption can
best be fought through new laws, more controls, a change in
mentality, or an ethical revolution. Laws and controls, however,
prove insufficient when democratic institutions are not strong
enough to enforce them. Robert Klitgaard from the Institute
for Contemporary Studies, Oakland, California, proposed a
metaphorical formula for Corruption that can help identify
the characteristics of good governance that can effectively
reduce corruption:
C (Corruption)=M(Monopoly)+D(Discretion)-A(Accountability)
Other experts have tinkered with this equation
and suggested additional other dimensions, such as integrity
and ethics. An alternative formulation suggested by Richard
Holloway in the UNDP Source Book on Accountability, Transparency
and Integrity follows:
Corruption=(Monopoly + Discretion)-(Accountability+Integrity+Transparency)
This formula recognizes that Accountability, Integrity and
Transparency are all important factors to balance against
Monopoly and Discretion.
Corruption is also a matter of economic calculation.
If the probability of being caught is small, the penalty is
mild and rewards are great, people are encouraged to engage
in corruption.
A strategy to prevent and fight corruption,
therefore, should look for ways to reduce monopoly power,
limit and clarify discretion and increase accountability and
transparency. It should also take into account the increase
of penalties and probabilities of being caught, as well as
ways of linking pay and promotion to performance.
The above prompt to the need to promote the
following good governance characteristics:
- Accountability
guided by clear standards and rules, enhanced by the Participation
of citizens, NGOs, the media and businesses
in a variety of ways
-
Transparency in making and implementing
decisions, opening the access to information and providing
clear, understandable information to improve citizens' oversight
of what the government is doing
- Responsibility
of public officials, clarified by simple rules and regulations
that reduce discretion of decision making and increase accountability
toward those affected by the decisions
- Effectiveness
and efficiency in public services provision, that is supported
by limiting monopoly situations and promoting competition
- Professionalism of civil servants, enhanced by linkages
between pay, promotion and performance and incentives for
continuous learning
- Rule
of law, enforced by strong judicial institutions
able to apply effective penalties for corruption.
To promote good governance and fight corruption,
a powerful political will is needed, a clear short, medium
and long term strategy as well as the contribution of all
sectors of the society: public, private and civil society.
We are all in this together, and together we must find a way
out.
Many NGOs from the CEE region have gained
valuable experience in promoting good governance and fighting
corruption for democracy consolidation. The Bucharest Forum
will encourage them to explore ways for cooperation to increase
the impact of their efforts.
|